Claude 3 Haiku vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Claude 3 Haiku | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.25 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.25 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Claude 3 Haiku | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Claude 3 Haiku is 17% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 200K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Claude 3 Haiku supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Haiku or Codestral?
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Claude 3 Haiku is 17% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Claude 3 Haiku and Codestral?
Claude 3 Haiku output: $1.25/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Codestral is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Claude 3 Haiku best used for?
Claude 3 Haiku is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.