Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Input Price | $0.25 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.25 /1M tokens | $2.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Claude 3 Haiku is 17% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 2.5 Flash offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 200K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Claude 3 Haiku supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 3 (coding, vision, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Haiku or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/1M input vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at $0.3/1M input. Claude 3 Haiku is 17% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Claude 3 Haiku and Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude 3 Haiku output: $1.25/1M, Gemini 2.5 Flash output: $2.5/1M. Claude 3 Haiku is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Claude 3 Haiku best used for?
Claude 3 Haiku is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 2.5 Flash best used for?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.