All models

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities

Input Price Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku (Input)
$0.25
GPT-5.1 Codex mini (Input)
$0.25
Claude 3 Haiku (Output)
$1.25
GPT-5.1 Codex mini (Output)
$2
AttributeClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.1 Codex mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$0.25 /1M tokens$0.25 /1M tokens
Output Price$1.25 /1M tokens$2 /1M tokens
Cached Input$0.025 /1M tokens$0.025 /1M tokens
Context Window200K400K
Typechatchat
Statuscurrentcurrent

Capability Comparison

CapabilityClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5.1 Codex mini
coding
multilingual

Which should you choose?

Budget-conscious: Claude 3 Haiku is 0% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens). Both models have the same input price.

Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5.1 Codex mini offers a larger context window (400K vs 200K), making it better for long documents or conversations.

Capability fit: Claude 3 Haiku supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while GPT-5.1 Codex mini supports 1 (coding).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-5.1 Codex mini?

Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/1M input vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini at $0.25/1M input. Claude 3 Haiku is 0% cheaper on input tokens.

How do output prices compare between Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5.1 Codex mini?

Claude 3 Haiku output: $1.25/1M, GPT-5.1 Codex mini output: $2/1M. Claude 3 Haiku is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.

What is Claude 3 Haiku best used for?

Claude 3 Haiku is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.

What is GPT-5.1 Codex mini best used for?

GPT-5.1 Codex mini is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.

Related Comparisons