Claude 3 Haiku vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 4 Maverick
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Claude 3 Haiku | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.25 /1M tokens | $0.27 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.25 /1M tokens | $0.85 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.027 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Claude 3 Haiku | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Claude 3 Haiku is 7% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.27 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (256K vs 200K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Claude 3 Haiku supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/1M input vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.27/1M input. Claude 3 Haiku is 7% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Claude 3 Haiku and Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude 3 Haiku output: $1.25/1M, Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Claude 3 Haiku best used for?
Claude 3 Haiku is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.