Codestral vs Grok 3 Mini
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Codestral | Grok 3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | xAI |
| Input Price | $0.3 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.9 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.030 /1M tokens | $0.075 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Codestral | Grok 3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| reasoning |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Codestral is 0% cheaper on input tokens ($0.3 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens). Both models have the same input price.
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Codestral supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Grok 3 Mini supports 2 (reasoning, coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Codestral or Grok 3 Mini?
Codestral costs $0.3/1M input vs Grok 3 Mini at $0.3/1M input. Codestral is 0% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Codestral and Grok 3 Mini?
Codestral output: $0.9/1M, Grok 3 Mini output: $0.5/1M. Grok 3 Mini is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Grok 3 Mini best used for?
Grok 3 Mini is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its reasoning and coding capabilities.