DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Input Price | $0.14 /1M tokens | $0.15 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.28 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.028 /1M tokens | $0.015 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | deprecated |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| reasoning | ||
| multilingual | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: DeepSeek-V4-Flash is 7% cheaper on input tokens ($0.14 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: DeepSeek-V4-Flash supports 3 capabilities (coding, reasoning, multilingual), while Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k supports 2 (vision, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs $0.14/1M input vs Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k at $0.15/1M input. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is 7% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash output: $0.28/1M, Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k output: $0.6/1M. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is DeepSeek-V4-Flash best used for?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k best used for?
Gemini 1.5 Flash >128k is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its vision and multilingual capabilities.