Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Input Price | $0.075 /1M tokens | $0.075 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.3 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0075 /1M tokens | $0.0075 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | deprecated | deprecated |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is 0% cheaper on input tokens ($0.075 vs $0.075 per 1M tokens). Both models have the same input price.
Context-heavy tasks: Both models offer the same context window size.
Capability fit: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k supports 2 capabilities (vision, multilingual), while Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k or Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k costs $0.075/1M input vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite at $0.075/1M input. Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is 0% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k output: $0.3/1M, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite output: $0.3/1M. Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k best used for?
Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite best used for?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.