All models

Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k vs GPT-5 Mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities

Input Price Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k (Input)
$0.075
GPT-5 Mini (Input)
$0.25
Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k (Output)
$0.3
GPT-5 Mini (Output)
$2
AttributeGemini 1.5 Flash ≤128kGPT-5 Mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$0.075 /1M tokens$0.25 /1M tokens
Output Price$0.3 /1M tokens$2 /1M tokens
Cached Input$0.0075 /1M tokens$0.025 /1M tokens
Context Window1.0M400K
Typechatchat
Statusdeprecatedcurrent

Capability Comparison

CapabilityGemini 1.5 Flash ≤128kGPT-5 Mini
vision
multilingual
coding

Which should you choose?

Budget-conscious: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is 70% cheaper on input tokens ($0.075 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens).

Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 400K), making it better for long documents or conversations.

Capability fit: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k supports 2 capabilities (vision, multilingual), while GPT-5 Mini supports 2 (coding, multilingual).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k or GPT-5 Mini?

Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k costs $0.075/1M input vs GPT-5 Mini at $0.25/1M input. Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is 70% cheaper on input tokens.

How do output prices compare between Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k and GPT-5 Mini?

Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k output: $0.3/1M, GPT-5 Mini output: $2/1M. Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.

What is Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k best used for?

Gemini 1.5 Flash ≤128k is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.

What is GPT-5 Mini best used for?

GPT-5 Mini is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.

Related Comparisons