All models

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities

Input Price Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k (Input)
$0.0375
GPT-4.1 Mini (Input)
$0.4
Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k (Output)
$0.15
GPT-4.1 Mini (Output)
$1.6
AttributeGemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128kGPT-4.1 Mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$0.0375 /1M tokens$0.4 /1M tokens
Output Price$0.15 /1M tokens$1.6 /1M tokens
Cached Input$0.0037 /1M tokens$0.100 /1M tokens
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Typechatchat
Statusdeprecatedcurrent

Capability Comparison

CapabilityGemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128kGPT-4.1 Mini
multilingual
coding

Which should you choose?

Budget-conscious: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k is 91% cheaper on input tokens ($0.0375 vs $0.4 per 1M tokens).

Context-heavy tasks: Both models offer the same context window size.

Capability fit: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while GPT-4.1 Mini supports 2 (coding, multilingual).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k or GPT-4.1 Mini?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k costs $0.0375/1M input vs GPT-4.1 Mini at $0.4/1M input. Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k is 91% cheaper on input tokens.

How do output prices compare between Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k and GPT-4.1 Mini?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k output: $0.15/1M, GPT-4.1 Mini output: $1.6/1M. Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.

What is Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k best used for?

Gemini 1.5 Flash-8B ≤128k is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.

What is GPT-4.1 Mini best used for?

GPT-4.1 Mini is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.

Related Comparisons