GPT-4.1 Nano vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-4.1 Nano | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.1 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-4.1 Nano | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-4.1 Nano is 67% cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-4.1 Nano offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 256K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-4.1 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-4.1 Nano or Codestral?
GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. GPT-4.1 Nano is 67% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-4.1 Nano and Codestral?
GPT-4.1 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. GPT-4.1 Nano is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-4.1 Nano best used for?
GPT-4.1 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.