GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-4.1 Nano | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.1 /1M tokens | $0.17 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.017 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 10.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-4.1 Nano | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual | ||
| coding | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-4.1 Nano is 41% cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.17 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 1.0M), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-4.1 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Llama 4 Scout supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.1/1M input vs Llama 4 Scout at $0.17/1M input. GPT-4.1 Nano is 41% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M. GPT-4.1 Nano is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-4.1 Nano best used for?
GPT-4.1 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.