GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.17 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.075 /1M tokens | $0.017 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128K | 10.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-4o Mini is 12% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.17 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-4o Mini supports 3 capabilities (coding, vision, multilingual), while Llama 4 Scout supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15/1M input vs Llama 4 Scout at $0.17/1M input. GPT-4o Mini is 12% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-4o Mini and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4o Mini output: $0.6/1M, Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-4o Mini best used for?
GPT-4o Mini is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.