GPT-5 Nano vs Command R
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5 Nano | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Cohere |
| Input Price | $0.05 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $1.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0050 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5 Nano | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5 Nano is 90% cheaper on input tokens ($0.05 vs $0.5 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5 Nano offers a larger context window (400K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Command R supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5 Nano or Command R?
GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input vs Command R at $0.5/1M input. GPT-5 Nano is 90% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5 Nano and Command R?
GPT-5 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Command R output: $1.5/1M. GPT-5 Nano is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5 Nano best used for?
GPT-5 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Command R best used for?
Command R is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.