GPT-5 Nano vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
GPT-5 Nano
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5 Nano | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input Price | $0.05 /1M tokens | $0.075 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0050 /1M tokens | $0.0075 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | deprecated |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5 Nano | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5 Nano is 33% cheaper on input tokens ($0.05 vs $0.075 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 400K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5 Nano or Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite at $0.075/1M input. GPT-5 Nano is 33% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5 Nano and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
GPT-5 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite output: $0.3/1M. Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5 Nano best used for?
GPT-5 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite best used for?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.