GPT-5 Nano vs Mistral Small 3.1
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
GPT-5 Nano
Mistral Small 3.1
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5 Nano | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.05 /1M tokens | $0.1 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0050 /1M tokens | $0.010 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5 Nano | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5 Nano is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($0.05 vs $0.1 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5 Nano offers a larger context window (400K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Mistral Small 3.1 supports 2 (coding, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5 Nano or Mistral Small 3.1?
GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input vs Mistral Small 3.1 at $0.1/1M input. GPT-5 Nano is 50% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5 Nano and Mistral Small 3.1?
GPT-5 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Mistral Small 3.1 output: $0.3/1M. Mistral Small 3.1 is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5 Nano best used for?
GPT-5 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Mistral Small 3.1 best used for?
Mistral Small 3.1 is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.