GPT-5 Nano vs Pixtral 12B
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5 Nano | Pixtral 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.05 /1M tokens | $0.15 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.15 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0050 /1M tokens | $0.015 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5 Nano | Pixtral 12B |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual | ||
| vision | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5 Nano is 67% cheaper on input tokens ($0.05 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5 Nano offers a larger context window (400K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5 Nano supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Pixtral 12B supports 2 (vision, coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5 Nano or Pixtral 12B?
GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05/1M input vs Pixtral 12B at $0.15/1M input. GPT-5 Nano is 67% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5 Nano and Pixtral 12B?
GPT-5 Nano output: $0.4/1M, Pixtral 12B output: $0.15/1M. Pixtral 12B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5 Nano best used for?
GPT-5 Nano is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Pixtral 12B best used for?
Pixtral 12B is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its vision and coding capabilities.