GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5.1 Codex mini | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.25 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $2 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5.1 Codex mini | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5.1 Codex mini is 17% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5.1 Codex mini offers a larger context window (400K vs 256K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5.1 Codex mini supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Codestral?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini costs $0.25/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. GPT-5.1 Codex mini is 17% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5.1 Codex mini and Codestral?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini output: $2/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Codestral is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5.1 Codex mini best used for?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.