GPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
GPT-5.1 Codex mini
Llama 4 Maverick
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | GPT-5.1 Codex mini | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.25 /1M tokens | $0.27 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $2 /1M tokens | $0.85 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.025 /1M tokens | $0.027 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 400K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | GPT-5.1 Codex mini | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: GPT-5.1 Codex mini is 7% cheaper on input tokens ($0.25 vs $0.27 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: GPT-5.1 Codex mini offers a larger context window (400K vs 256K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: GPT-5.1 Codex mini supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5.1 Codex mini or Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini costs $0.25/1M input vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.27/1M input. GPT-5.1 Codex mini is 7% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between GPT-5.1 Codex mini and Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini output: $2/1M, Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is GPT-5.1 Codex mini best used for?
GPT-5.1 Codex mini is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.