Grok 3 Mini vs Kimi K2 0905 Preview
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Grok 3 Mini
Kimi K2 0905 Preview
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok 3 Mini | Kimi K2 0905 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Input Price | $0.3 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.5 /1M tokens | $2.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.075 /1M tokens | $0.150 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | preview |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok 3 Mini | Kimi K2 0905 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| reasoning | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok 3 Mini is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($0.3 vs $0.6 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Both models offer the same context window size.
Capability fit: Grok 3 Mini supports 2 capabilities (reasoning, coding), while Kimi K2 0905 Preview supports 2 (reasoning, coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok 3 Mini or Kimi K2 0905 Preview?
Grok 3 Mini costs $0.3/1M input vs Kimi K2 0905 Preview at $0.6/1M input. Grok 3 Mini is 50% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok 3 Mini and Kimi K2 0905 Preview?
Grok 3 Mini output: $0.5/1M, Kimi K2 0905 Preview output: $2.5/1M. Grok 3 Mini is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok 3 Mini best used for?
Grok 3 Mini is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Kimi K2 0905 Preview best used for?
Kimi K2 0905 Preview is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its reasoning and coding capabilities.