Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k
Codestral
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.2 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.5 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.050 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 256K |
| Type | reasoning | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| reasoning | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k is 33% cheaper on input tokens ($0.2 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k supports 1 capabilities (reasoning), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k or Codestral?
Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k costs $0.2/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k is 33% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k and Codestral?
Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k output: $0.5/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k best used for?
Grok 4 Fast Reasoning ≤128k is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.