Grok Code Fast 1 vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok Code Fast 1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.2 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.5 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.020 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok Code Fast 1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok Code Fast 1 is 33% cheaper on input tokens ($0.2 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Grok Code Fast 1 supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok Code Fast 1 or Codestral?
Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Grok Code Fast 1 is 33% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok Code Fast 1 and Codestral?
Grok Code Fast 1 output: $1.5/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Codestral is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok Code Fast 1 best used for?
Grok Code Fast 1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.