Grok Code Fast 1 vs Command R
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok Code Fast 1 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Cohere |
| Input Price | $0.2 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.5 /1M tokens | $1.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.020 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok Code Fast 1 | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok Code Fast 1 is 60% cheaper on input tokens ($0.2 vs $0.5 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (131K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Grok Code Fast 1 supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Command R supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok Code Fast 1 or Command R?
Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input vs Command R at $0.5/1M input. Grok Code Fast 1 is 60% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok Code Fast 1 and Command R?
Grok Code Fast 1 output: $1.5/1M, Command R output: $1.5/1M. Command R is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok Code Fast 1 best used for?
Grok Code Fast 1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Command R best used for?
Command R is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.