Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 3.1 70B
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Grok Code Fast 1
Llama 3.1 70B
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok Code Fast 1 | Llama 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.2 /1M tokens | $0.23 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.5 /1M tokens | $0.4 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.020 /1M tokens | $0.023 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok Code Fast 1 | Llama 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok Code Fast 1 is 13% cheaper on input tokens ($0.2 vs $0.23 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (131K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Grok Code Fast 1 supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Llama 3.1 70B supports 2 (coding, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 3.1 70B?
Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input vs Llama 3.1 70B at $0.23/1M input. Grok Code Fast 1 is 13% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 3.1 70B?
Grok Code Fast 1 output: $1.5/1M, Llama 3.1 70B output: $0.4/1M. Llama 3.1 70B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok Code Fast 1 best used for?
Grok Code Fast 1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 3.1 70B best used for?
Llama 3.1 70B is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.