Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Grok Code Fast 1
Llama 4 Maverick
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Grok Code Fast 1 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.2 /1M tokens | $0.27 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.5 /1M tokens | $0.85 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.020 /1M tokens | $0.027 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Grok Code Fast 1 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Grok Code Fast 1 is 26% cheaper on input tokens ($0.2 vs $0.27 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Grok Code Fast 1 supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Grok Code Fast 1 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.2/1M input vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.27/1M input. Grok Code Fast 1 is 26% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok Code Fast 1 output: $1.5/1M, Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Grok Code Fast 1 best used for?
Grok Code Fast 1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.