Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 3.3 70B
Llama 4 Maverick
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 3.3 70B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.23 /1M tokens | $0.27 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.4 /1M tokens | $0.85 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.023 /1M tokens | $0.027 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 3.3 70B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 3.3 70B is 15% cheaper on input tokens ($0.23 vs $0.27 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (256K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 3.3 70B supports 1 capabilities (coding), while Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 3.3 70B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.23/1M input vs Llama 4 Maverick at $0.27/1M input. Llama 3.3 70B is 15% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 3.3 70B and Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 3.3 70B output: $0.4/1M, Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M. Llama 3.3 70B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 3.3 70B best used for?
Llama 3.3 70B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.