Llama 4 Maverick vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Maverick | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.27 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.85 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.027 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Maverick is 10% cheaper on input tokens ($0.27 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Both models offer the same context window size.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Maverick or Codestral?
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.27/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Llama 4 Maverick is 10% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Maverick and Codestral?
Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.