Llama 4 Maverick vs Command R
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Maverick | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Cohere |
| Input Price | $0.27 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.85 /1M tokens | $1.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.027 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256K | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Maverick is 46% cheaper on input tokens ($0.27 vs $0.5 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window (256K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Command R supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Maverick or Command R?
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.27/1M input vs Command R at $0.5/1M input. Llama 4 Maverick is 46% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Maverick and Command R?
Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M, Command R output: $1.5/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Command R best used for?
Command R is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.