Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Maverick | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Input Price | $0.27 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.85 /1M tokens | $2.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.027 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Maverick is 10% cheaper on input tokens ($0.27 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 2.5 Flash offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 256K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Maverick supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 3 (coding, vision, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Maverick or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.27/1M input vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at $0.3/1M input. Llama 4 Maverick is 10% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Maverick and Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Llama 4 Maverick output: $0.85/1M, Gemini 2.5 Flash output: $2.5/1M. Llama 4 Maverick is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Maverick best used for?
Llama 4 Maverick is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 2.5 Flash best used for?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.