Llama 4 Scout vs Claude 3 Haiku
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 4 Scout
Claude 3 Haiku
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | Claude 3 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Anthropic |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.25 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $1.25 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.025 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 200K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | Claude 3 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 32% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 200K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Claude 3 Haiku supports 2 (coding, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or Claude 3 Haiku?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs Claude 3 Haiku at $0.25/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 32% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and Claude 3 Haiku?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, Claude 3 Haiku output: $1.25/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Claude 3 Haiku best used for?
Claude 3 Haiku is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.