Llama 4 Scout vs Command R
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Cohere |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $1.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 66% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.5 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Command R supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or Command R?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs Command R at $0.5/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 66% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and Command R?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, Command R output: $1.5/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Command R best used for?
Command R is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.