Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek Chat
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 4 Scout
DeepSeek Chat
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | DeepSeek Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | DeepSeek |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.27 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $1.1 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.027 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 128K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | DeepSeek Chat |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 37% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.27 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while DeepSeek Chat supports 2 (coding, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or DeepSeek Chat?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs DeepSeek Chat at $0.27/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 37% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and DeepSeek Chat?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, DeepSeek Chat output: $1.1/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is DeepSeek Chat best used for?
DeepSeek Chat is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and multilingual capabilities.