Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek Reasoner
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 4 Scout
DeepSeek Reasoner
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | DeepSeek Reasoner |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | DeepSeek |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.55 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $2.19 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.055 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 128K |
| Type | chat | reasoning |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | DeepSeek Reasoner |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| reasoning |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 69% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.55 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while DeepSeek Reasoner supports 2 (reasoning, coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or DeepSeek Reasoner?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs DeepSeek Reasoner at $0.55/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 69% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and DeepSeek Reasoner?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, DeepSeek Reasoner output: $2.19/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is DeepSeek Reasoner best used for?
DeepSeek Reasoner is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its reasoning and coding capabilities.