Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Llama 4 Scout
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $2.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 43% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 1.0M), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 3 (coding, vision, multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at $0.3/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 43% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, Gemini 2.5 Flash output: $2.5/1M. Llama 4 Scout is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 2.5 Flash best used for?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.