Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Saba
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Llama 4 Scout | Mistral Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.17 /1M tokens | $0.2 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.6 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.017 /1M tokens | $0.020 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 10.0M | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | Mistral Saba |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| vision | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Llama 4 Scout is 15% cheaper on input tokens ($0.17 vs $0.2 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Llama 4 Scout supports 2 capabilities (coding, vision), while Mistral Saba supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Llama 4 Scout or Mistral Saba?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.17/1M input vs Mistral Saba at $0.2/1M input. Llama 4 Scout is 15% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Saba?
Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M, Mistral Saba output: $0.6/1M. Mistral Saba is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Mistral Saba best used for?
Mistral Saba is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.