Mistral Small 3.1 vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Mistral Small 3.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.1 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.3 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.010 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Mistral Small 3.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Mistral Small 3.1 is 67% cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Mistral Small 3.1 supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Mistral Small 3.1 or Codestral?
Mistral Small 3.1 costs $0.1/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Mistral Small 3.1 is 67% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Mistral Small 3.1 and Codestral?
Mistral Small 3.1 output: $0.3/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Mistral Small 3.1 is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Mistral Small 3.1 best used for?
Mistral Small 3.1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.