Mistral Small 3.1 vs Mistral NeMo
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Mistral Small 3.1
Mistral NeMo
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Mistral Small 3.1 | Mistral NeMo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.1 /1M tokens | $0.15 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.3 /1M tokens | $0.15 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.010 /1M tokens | $0.015 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Mistral Small 3.1 | Mistral NeMo |
|---|---|---|
| coding | ||
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Mistral Small 3.1 is 33% cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Both models offer the same context window size.
Capability fit: Mistral Small 3.1 supports 2 capabilities (coding, multilingual), while Mistral NeMo supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Mistral Small 3.1 or Mistral NeMo?
Mistral Small 3.1 costs $0.1/1M input vs Mistral NeMo at $0.15/1M input. Mistral Small 3.1 is 33% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Mistral Small 3.1 and Mistral NeMo?
Mistral Small 3.1 output: $0.3/1M, Mistral NeMo output: $0.15/1M. Mistral NeMo is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Mistral Small 3.1 best used for?
Mistral Small 3.1 is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Mistral NeMo best used for?
Mistral NeMo is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.