Pixtral 12B vs Codestral
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Pixtral 12B | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.3 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.9 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.015 /1M tokens | $0.030 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 256K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Pixtral 12B | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| vision | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Pixtral 12B is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.3 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Codestral offers a larger context window (256K vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Pixtral 12B supports 2 capabilities (vision, coding), while Codestral supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Pixtral 12B or Codestral?
Pixtral 12B costs $0.15/1M input vs Codestral at $0.3/1M input. Pixtral 12B is 50% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Pixtral 12B and Codestral?
Pixtral 12B output: $0.15/1M, Codestral output: $0.9/1M. Pixtral 12B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Pixtral 12B best used for?
Pixtral 12B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Codestral best used for?
Codestral is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.