Pixtral 12B vs Grok 4 Fast >128k
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Pixtral 12B
Grok 4 Fast >128k
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Pixtral 12B | Grok 4 Fast >128k |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | xAI |
| Input Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.4 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $1 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.015 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Pixtral 12B | Grok 4 Fast >128k |
|---|---|---|
| vision | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Pixtral 12B is 63% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.4 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Grok 4 Fast >128k offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Pixtral 12B supports 2 capabilities (vision, coding), while Grok 4 Fast >128k supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Pixtral 12B or Grok 4 Fast >128k?
Pixtral 12B costs $0.15/1M input vs Grok 4 Fast >128k at $0.4/1M input. Pixtral 12B is 63% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Pixtral 12B and Grok 4 Fast >128k?
Pixtral 12B output: $0.15/1M, Grok 4 Fast >128k output: $1/1M. Pixtral 12B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Pixtral 12B best used for?
Pixtral 12B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Grok 4 Fast >128k best used for?
Grok 4 Fast >128k is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.