Pixtral 12B vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Pixtral 12B
Llama 4 Scout
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Pixtral 12B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Input Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.17 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.6 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.015 /1M tokens | $0.017 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 131K | 10.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Pixtral 12B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| vision | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Pixtral 12B is 12% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.17 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window (10.0M vs 131K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Pixtral 12B supports 2 capabilities (vision, coding), while Llama 4 Scout supports 2 (coding, vision).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Pixtral 12B or Llama 4 Scout?
Pixtral 12B costs $0.15/1M input vs Llama 4 Scout at $0.17/1M input. Pixtral 12B is 12% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Pixtral 12B and Llama 4 Scout?
Pixtral 12B output: $0.15/1M, Llama 4 Scout output: $0.6/1M. Pixtral 12B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Pixtral 12B best used for?
Pixtral 12B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Llama 4 Scout best used for?
Llama 4 Scout is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding and vision capabilities.