Command R7B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Command R7B
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Command R7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Input Price | $0.037 /1M tokens | $0.25 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $1.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0037 /1M tokens | $0.025 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128K | 1.0M |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | preview |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Command R7B | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Command R7B is 85% cheaper on input tokens ($0.037 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite offers a larger context window (1.0M vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Command R7B supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite supports 1 (multilingual).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Command R7B or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Command R7B costs $0.037/1M input vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at $0.25/1M input. Command R7B is 85% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Command R7B and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Command R7B output: $0.15/1M, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite output: $1.5/1M. Command R7B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Command R7B best used for?
Command R7B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite best used for?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its multilingual capabilities.