Command R7B vs Grok 4 Fast ≤128k
Side-by-side comparison of pricing and capabilities
Command R7B
Grok 4 Fast ≤128k
Input Price Comparison
| Attribute | Command R7B | Grok 4 Fast ≤128k |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Input Price | $0.037 /1M tokens | $0.2 /1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.15 /1M tokens | $0.5 /1M tokens |
| Cached Input | $0.0037 /1M tokens | $0.050 /1M tokens |
| Context Window | 128K | 131K |
| Type | chat | chat |
| Status | current | current |
Capability Comparison
| Capability | Command R7B | Grok 4 Fast ≤128k |
|---|---|---|
| multilingual | ||
| coding |
Which should you choose?
Budget-conscious: Command R7B is 82% cheaper on input tokens ($0.037 vs $0.2 per 1M tokens).
Context-heavy tasks: Grok 4 Fast ≤128k offers a larger context window (131K vs 128K), making it better for long documents or conversations.
Capability fit: Command R7B supports 1 capabilities (multilingual), while Grok 4 Fast ≤128k supports 1 (coding).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Command R7B or Grok 4 Fast ≤128k?
Command R7B costs $0.037/1M input vs Grok 4 Fast ≤128k at $0.2/1M input. Command R7B is 82% cheaper on input tokens.
How do output prices compare between Command R7B and Grok 4 Fast ≤128k?
Command R7B output: $0.15/1M, Grok 4 Fast ≤128k output: $0.5/1M. Command R7B is more economical for generation-heavy workloads.
What is Command R7B best used for?
Command R7B is best for budget-conscious applications, high-volume chatbots, and tasks where cost efficiency is the primary concern.
What is Grok 4 Fast ≤128k best used for?
Grok 4 Fast ≤128k is suited for complex reasoning, analysis, and tasks that benefit from its coding capabilities.